In Part I of this post I looked at the impact of the two significant event in the OneWorld Alliance, namely:
- Qatar joining OneWorld
- US Airways and American Airline deciding to merge
This has made me re-examine my loyalty to Star Alliance. In this post I will look at, or really just think aloud of the pro and cons of Star Alliance vs. OneWorld – for me. You will need to take this argument and apply it to your needs – your location and your travel patterns. Lets take a look.
The number one consideration for me is International routes. I fly internationally a lot. This year I flew to 10 countries over the whole year – primarily in Europe and Asia. For this, routing becomes very important. Routing in turn, is determined by hub location. I live in the Washington, DC area. Hence, my primary airport is Washington Dulles (IAD). The following airlines from the two Alliances fly to IAD:
- United (Hub)
- US Airways (Merging with American Airlines)
- South African
- Air Canada
- Brussels Airlines
- Ethiopian Airlines
- Turkish Airlines
- TAM Airlines (defecting to OneWorld)
- American Airlines
- US Airways (as American Airlines, post merger)
- British Airways
- TAM (Defecting from Star Alliance)
Just to be fair and balanced, lets look at SkyTeam too:
- Air France
- Korean Air
The impact of Hubs:
What a hub does is determine possible routes. Lets take an example with two cities – one which is not a hub for any alliance (Dubai) and another which has no direct flight by any airline to the US (Singapore). All major airlines of the world fly to both these cities.
If I want to fly to Dubai from Washington Dulles, I have one direct fly by an alliance airline – United has a non-stop and one by a non-alliance airline – Emirates. So, if I chose to fly OneWorld, I will need to go thru a hub, making it a one-stop route for any other alliance.
With Singapore Airlines ending its non-stop flights to Newark (EWR) and Los Angeles (LAX), no airline has a non-stop between the US and Singapore, making it an even playing field – there has to be a stop on the way. This opens up interesting comparisons.
Using either Alliance, I can fly to Singapore thru Europe – Lufthansa, Austrian or Turkish (if you consider Turkey to be in Europe) for Star Alliance or British Airways for OneWorld. Or thru Asia – United and ANA for Star Alliance and American for One World. Alternate routes are thru Africa with South Africa – Star Alliance (way too long), or the new interesting one – thru the Middle East with Qatar (OneWorld)!
All these routes are 1-stop, except for the American route which will take me thru a domestic AA hub then to Asia and then on to Singapore. The Qatar route thru Doha is new and exciting. Given it is Qatar, it is much better service than any of the other airlines that fly out of IAD!
I have made similar analysis to cities in India. All routes from IAD are 1-stop. Qatar adds an alternate route, which actually offers destinations in India that are many more than any other airline in any alliance.
From a domestic routing perspective, if I stick to IAD as my start point, ignoring DCA (Washington National), United and hence Star Alliance wins hands down. For a destination other than American and US Airways’ hubs, for a flight to any other city in the US, I will need to make a 1-stop trip, no matter what, if I switch to OneWorld.
Given my travel patterns, what is really attracting me to consider One World is Qatar. It offers new alternate routings to cities in Asia and India that Star Alliance does not have. One World limited my trips to Europe, as I would have to go thru London (LHR), taking British, to any other city in Europe. Or fly thru a American Airlines hub. So, 1-stop either ways. To Asia, I would say they both have equally bad non-stop coverage – United flies non-stop to Tokyo and Beijing (PEK) and ANA to Tokyo (NRT). For all other cities in Asia, it is 1-stop anyways.
Domestically, United hence, has a massive advantage.
The future is of course, unknown. There is a possibility that an India based airline may finally join an alliance. You one that is viable, not Kingfisher. I would love to see Jet Airways, but given that Etihad just bought a major stake, it may be a package deal – Jet + Etihad joining Star Alliance. They will not join OneWorld as Qatar is already there. If that happens, or for that matter any Middle East or India based airline joins Star Alliance, it will end the dilemma for me. Even if it is Air India… maybe…
So, what am I planning to do? Not sure. I will decide once I have a better idea of my travel patterns for next year. This year it was mostly Asia and some Europe. If Asia remains predominant, I may take the plunge and start flying Qatar.
What do you suggest? Should I switch to OneWorld, dumping Star Alliance?
I have until the end of the year to decide. In the meanwhile, I am maximizing the miles I can collect using credit cards for:
- US Airways – The US Airways Premier World MasterCard®
- American Airlines (not an affiliate link)
- Lufthansa – The Lufthansa Premier Miles & More World MasterCard® and
- United (not an affiliate link)
Disclaimer: This content is not provided or commissioned by the credit card issuer. Opinions expressed here are author’s alone, not those of the credit card issuer, and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by the credit card issuer. This site may be compensated through the credit card issuer Affiliate Program.